Esta é a cache do Google de;u=2329;sa=showPosts. É um instantâneo da página, tal como surgiu no dia 6 Dez 2011 22:09:58 GMT. Entretanto, a página actual poderá ter sofrido algumas alterações. Saiba mais

Versão completa
Latest posts of: portuguese anarchist
December 06, 2011, 04:09:57 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. 1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News: This Forum has been just opened! Everyone interested in serious discussions regarding the 9/11 is welcome to joined it!  
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  General Category / Do you believe that the US Government indeed exploits two "truths" about 9/11 - one for public consumption, and one - for "big guys"? / Re: Two government 'truths' regarding 9/11. Does it sound real? on: September 05, 2011, 03:09:04 AM
I most certainly do believe in different stories being told to different people, who have different levels of knowledge, where a second group that knows that the official story cannot be true is told a different story, that still is not the truth.

And I believe I have identified two other cases were the same thing happened, both of them related to the nuclear demolition of the WTC, because both of them also involved mini-nuclear explosions.

And this ones are
(1) the Oklahoma City bombing and
(2) the Chernobyl incident.

(1) Concerning the first case of the Oklahoma City bombing, everyone knows the official story involving Timothy McVeigh etc... (First Truth)
But what I recently learned was that, for certain people inside the government and police forces, what was told was that the explosion was the result of a "sting operation" gone wrong.
What I deduce from this is that, everyone that is part of the higher echelons of the government and of the police forces knows that the kind of extremist groups the McVeigh supposedly belonged to are always infiltrated by government agents, and that there is no way that something like that could ever happen without the government knowing about it in advance. So, for people who know this, what was told was that "Yes, we did know about it. And we were going to make sure nobody would be killed. But we failed to do so." (Second Truth)
Now, what more well-informed people researching this kind of subjects know, is that neither of the previous stories are true, and that the government itself not only knew about it in advance, but was itself the entity responsible for the bombing, and that what really caused such destruction in the FBI building, was the use of mini-nuclear bombs. (Third Truth, that, everything indicates, is the real Truth)

(2) Concerning the second case of Chernobyl, almost everyone still believes today that the incident was the result of an accident. (First Truth)
But if you read Dr. John Coleman's booklet Nuclear Power: Anathema to the New World Order, you'll read in there that "the explosion was caused by trying to make weapons grade plutonium at a commercial nuclear plant designed to generate electricity and totally unsuited for making plutonium".
Being Dr. Coleman a person who, like Daniel Estulin, still has contacts in government and intelligence circles, what I assume is that, that was what was told to certain people in the Soviet government who constitute Dr. Coleman's direct or indirect sources. So, what I deduce is that, that is what was told to professionals in the nuclear industry who know that a reactor doesn't simply explode like that.
In other words, from what I understand, what people who know how a nuclear power plant works - and that there is no way that something like that could ever happen - were told, was that the accident was the result of a deliberate decision to violate normal procedures and security measures. Since there's no way that could happen in a normally-functioning nuclear power plant. (Second Truth)
But if you read Daniel Estulin's and Dimitri Khalezov's statements about this, you'll know that the explosion was the result of a sabotage ordered by the West, where a mini-nuke was used. (The main purpose of which was to try to demonize the use of nuclear energy, in order to try to advance the agenda of deindustrialization.) (Third Truth, that, everything indicates, is the real Truth)
2  Modern mini-nuke bombings masquerading as "truck-bombings" and "car-bombings". / Do you believe that Timothy McVeigh managed to commit mass-destruction using 2 tons of cheap conventional explosives, instead of some mini weapon of mass destruction? / Most interesting interview concerning the OKC bombing on: September 03, 2011, 02:04:48 AM
3  General Category / Dimitri Khalezov book - where to get it? / Re: Good news - free edition of the book is now available for download !!! on: September 01, 2011, 06:59:26 PM
Thank you so much for this.
I have been unemployed due to the Economic Collapse we're already living and have been short of money for all the books and monographs I want to buy before something happens to the Internet.
This book will be one more precious addition to my 9/11 archive.
4  Modern mini-nuke bombings masquerading as "truck-bombings" and "car-bombings". / Do you believe that Timothy McVeigh managed to commit mass-destruction using 2 tons of cheap conventional explosives, instead of some mini weapon of mass destruction? / Good overview of inconsistencies concerning the official OKC bombing story on: August 11, 2011, 01:53:30 PM
For those of you who haven't seen the film yet, you can check out an excerpt from Alex Jones' documentary 9/11: The Road to Tyranny, where he talks about several things in the official Oklahoma City bombing story that don't add up. I've posted it on YouTube and you can watch it here.
The author of that documentary is also of the opinion (to say the least..., and like the owner of this forum) that there's no way that Timothy McVeigh could have acted alone.
5  Modern mini-nuke bombings masquerading as "truck-bombings" and "car-bombings". / Do you believe that Timothy McVeigh managed to commit mass-destruction using 2 tons of cheap conventional explosives, instead of some mini weapon of mass destruction? / Possible confirmation that micronuclear bombs were used in Oklahoma City on: April 25, 2011, 02:28:28 PM
I remember Alex Jones interviewing, back in 2004, a doctor that claimed that one of his patients was one of the persons that was part of a military “munitions expert forensic team” that went into the Alfred P. Murrah building after the explosion(s). (The doctor in question is Dr. Bill Deagle MD, that is somewhat known among people researching government conspiracies, and that I see that has interviewed Dimitri Khalezov on his show.) This patient - described the doctor - told him he was really worried because he had been exposed to radiation while working on the debris. And this because, according to the patient and unlike the official story, the explosion had been caused by “micronuclear bombs placed on support pillars in the walls of the Federal Building, by special units of the ATF and FBI”.
This same doctor was already, back then, of the opinion that the buildings in 9/11 were “brought down probably in the same way as they brought down the Oklahoma City building”.

Here's the interview:

And here's an article published two months earlier:
6  General Category / Questions to Dimitri Khalezov / Re: Questions to Dimitri Khalezov could be posted here. on: April 21, 2011, 01:43:31 PM
How secure is the CipherWall program in Windows?

Hello there from Portugal, Mr. Khalezov.
First of all, let me thank you very much for your presentation concerning the World Trade Center demolition.
I was one of the lucky ones that were able to watch it on the "" website a year ago, and it was one of the most informative and eye-opening pieces of information I've come across in my now 8 years of research about the subject of the 9/11 attacks.
Thank you so much for your courage in exposing it, and I hope all ends up well for you, given the fact that the Western powers-that-be are trying to extradite you.
I wish you the best of luck in this ordeal and I wish you all the best in your life.
And concerning the reason for this post...
I'm writing to possibly warn you about a most serious flaw in the apparent security you might think you are having, and providing, with the use of the CipherWall program.
I guess you've also heard of the PROMIS software by now, so you'll know what a "backdoor" is and that certain entities do sell programs with backdoors in it, so that they can access the computers of the persons using such programs.
But are you aware of the strong suspicion people have had for years, that Microsoft Windows also has a backdoor for the US government? (
And that the US government helps with the development of Microsoft Windows? (
If this operating system does have a backdoor in it, that completely undermines the security the CipherWall program might offer... Since a backdoor can be used to install any kind of spy program. (If, Windows itself, being a closed-source operating system, where we don't know what's going on in the background, doesn't have one already...)
And given the unclear - and therefore, not very trustworthy - nature of the Windows operating system, should people not be told also to use an open-source operating system, like GNU/Linux, to better protect their privacy?
7  General Category / Dimitri Khalezov's video - where to download it now? How to promote it? / Re: Download links for 911thology video. on: April 21, 2011, 12:03:24 PM
As of April 2011, I can now find at least three people sharing it on YouTube.
I suppose that, even if they keep on censoring it, there will be people continuously trying to upload it again...
So, I guess anyone can always check this popular website when they hear or read about this presentation, and see if they're lucky.
(Although I strongly recommend everyone to get the DVD torrent anyway. It's a great piece of work and it's a much more simple way, and a way you can be sure, to get the whole presentation and also a very good medium through which one can spread the message.)
8  General Category / Discussing Dimitri Khalezov's video presentation on the WTC nuclear demolition / Re: Dimitri Khalezov's WTC nuclear demolition video of 26 parts. Has anyone watched? on: April 21, 2011, 11:15:32 AM
First class, ***** (5 stars), presentation!
The most mind-boggling explanation I have seen or heard, in my now 8 years of research of an already mind-boggling issue.
I was able to watch it entirely, in the beginning of May of last year, before the "" site reached its traffic limit. And came to know of its existence after Daniel Estulin posted one of its segments on his blog.
Usually, for such long presentations or documentaries, I make one or more intervals. But, for this one, I couldn't leave my chair... (Even despite the fact that the chair I was on, was not a comfortable one... Smiley )
I don't even feel the need to read the book. The video is enough to convince me.
There is only one thing talked about in it, that I'm very skeptic about, and I will have to make some research about this subject to try to clear my doubts. And that is the secondary argument, that is made, that there were no planes in the sky of New York that morning...
I know of several people researching the 9/11 attacks that don't believe the main argument about the nuclear demolition, but I'm sure it's just a question of time until a lot of them do, and that this video becomes one of the most well known and respected pieces of 9/11 Truth. (At least, among the most intelligent and open-minded people...)
Congratulations, Mr. Khalezov, for your great investigation.
And thank you very much, to you and Mr. Estulin, for making this video available for free.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!