That's an already known historical fact, that happened more than 50 years ago, and it's on the cia.gov own's website: https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/vol48no2/article10.html

Al Jazeera is not uncovering anything new.

Let them talk about the fake reasons for invading Afghanistan and Iraq, the ongoing US intervention in Central Asian states, and other much more important events unfolding, that are having a great impact on people alive today, if they're an international TV news channel worthy to watch.

Meanwhile, I rather watch Russia Today: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6OYdqFuTrs&feature=channel_page

Yes, they are, unfortunately.

Greenpeace is, not surprisingly, NWO-funded.

http://www.activistcash.com/organization_financials.cfm/oid/131

I've met some activists from this organization. They're not even aware of who funds them. They are told it's a secret. And are only told what to do when they are called for specific actions. They're one more group of domesticated people who do not question authority, and with this reveal to be very badly informed about the subjects they supposedly know more than the average citizen about.



Thanks for the compliment, Okinawa.

"The National Post wanted to send one of their chief writers here, who's writing a book, to interview me, and I told them 'No'. And you know what? I'm just gonna start telling all the media 'No'. I don't wanna talk to the newspapers and the magazines so they can try to spin and distort what we say."

--- Alex Jones, during the first hour of his Thursday, December 10th 2009, radio show


I don't know how fully will he implement his decision, since there might be some worthwhile exceptions to the rule. But I wanted to call everyone's attention to this.

This was a wise decision, in my opinion, made by Alex Jones.

This is exactly what I think, for years now. Don't give them the chance. Boycott the corporate media. Build your own one instead, and your message will get out undistorted. The only thing the mainstream media is worried about, when it comes to report on people opposing the interests it serves, is on demonizing them, making them look ridiculous and distorting their message.

This way, they surely also expect to "vaccinate" people against their message, so that when someone comes with direct contact with the persons trying to get their message out, his or her reaction will be to say "Oh, you're one of those... that thinks this and that...", thinking s/he already knows all about what you stand for and either not wanting to listen to you or filtering everything you say through the distorted view s/he has previously been exposed to.

And please note: I'm talking about "corporate"/"mainstream" media. Don't go out looking sideways at every local newspaper or such that might be honestly trying to report about you.

And also, don't be one of those retards that go on assaulting reporters and calling them names. Just politely say "No", explain why if they want you to and present them your own alternative source, and ignore them.


(I'm just giving my opinion here. Most of all, I want you to think for yourselves about this. As I said, there might be some situations where it is worthwhile to make an exception.)

Please tell me who he is then. And in which programme does he appear. I haven't had the opportunity to watch the channel much in the recent past, so I don't know who are you talking about. I will have much more opportunities to watch cable in the next weeks and, from your description, I'm most curious to hear him.

One more good archive to add up to the great coverage of this topic being done here at PrisonPlanet.com:

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=newsHighlights&newsId=24

The strongest piece of news propaganda I've seen concerning the "Man-Made Global Warming" fraud, from the place where I least expected for it to come from.

A "must-see"!

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2009/12/2009128161056232579.html


Al Jazeera joining up with all the other controlled media, in the propaganda blitz, by saying the world needs to be saved in Copenhagen:

http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/climatesos/

Like I said in my analysis... they have whitewashed the Climategate scandal, they are outrageously lying by claiming that the debate concerning the "man-made global warming" fraud is over, they have joined up with all the other controlled media in a special propaganda campaign that says the world needs to be saved in this Copenhagen summit, and they never make any decent cover concerning the most important issues, and schemes already dismantled by many, affecting our lives in the West. You never see them focus on outrageous daily events happening through out the Western World, that are of great concern in the way they threaten, of have already taken away, our rights, like Alex does. ("Don't worry... Stay asleep... There's nothing going on...")

Russia Today is another story. It's owned by the same government who protects Daniel Estulin and that has interest in fighting the NWO from within. And in that channel yes, you'll see interviews about the type of subjects I'm saying Al Jazeera doesn't talk about.

Even if the people at Al Jazeera were not aware of what's going on in the West and had never heard of Alex Jones (and others), which I don't believe, they surely watch Russia Today and other channels similar to their own, and by now know who he is. But they don't interview him also, do they?

(Title of the thread modified by a moderator, after a request from me, in order not to mislead anyone who only reads the title of it to think that this controlled network is any kind of "example" for anyone...)

Another[1] former military, aware of the power of television, that after years of certainly omitting, distorting, and lying about, several facts, to manipulate people's perception of reality, for the US Military, switched from one propaganda arm of the NWO to another.

Not only does the US Military indirectly fund Al Jazeera, it also trains for them professional gatekeepers.



"Rushing came to fame in Control Room, a movie critical of media coverage of the Iraq war as a military public affairs officer"
(...)
"Rushing says the State Department and Pentagon have both shown interest in working with the new network."
(...)
"Like it or not, 'Al Jazeera is the most influential Arab voice outside of mosques. It is the largest shaper of ideology,' says Rushing."

--- http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1110008,00.html



"Iraq's new government temporarily closed the network's offices in Baghdad, saying that Al-Jazeera incites insurgents"
(...)
"he explains, 'once a Marine, always a Marine.'"

--- http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2005-09-28-rushing-cover_x.htm



---
1. http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=97552

OK, I retract what I've said about Al Jazeera!

The incredible whitewash of the recent "Climategate" scandal and the strong adherence to the media propaganda blitz of the "man-made global warming" fraud they're making have just revealed it's true nature.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2009/12/200912715290171994.html
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2009/12/2009128161056232579.html (this one is a "must-see"!)

I never ruled out the possibility that it could indeed be a controlled news source, mainly because of it's funding, although it hadn't seem to me to be one in the past. But it's recent behaviour has just made it very clear to me.

Yes, it's true that many of it's programming appears to be, what I would call, "progressive", and yes it has been reporting fairly on some issues. Although, some of the debates I've seen are very tendentious in the way the theme is chosen.

But, not mentioning the recent whitewash and propaganda campaign, we should always bear in mind the most effective method of information control: omission.

Which is exactly what Al Jazeera English has been doing.

(And which, I believe, is where the term "gatekeeper" comes from - as "the one who controls the gate and only lets pass whatever s/he wants".)

None of what I consider to be the most important issues that are affecting our lives, like the continuous loss of civil rights and privacy all over the Western World (derived from an already proven false flag event that this network never talks about) and others that Alex extensively covers, are even mentioned on Al Jazeera.

That 9/11 special on the "Listening Post"... I really felt like I was doing quite a bit of mental gymnastics, when describing it, to try to fit it into my view of the channel as one that was trying to be "independent", "honest" and "progressive"... Looking well at it, it has always seemed also like a light hit piece on 9/11 truthers.

OK, they have interviewed John Perkins. And also NWO shills Ralph Nader[1] and Noam Chomsky. And have given air time to other people from the (NWO-created) Institute of Policy Studies. But so has other controlled left media. That, apart from a somewhat light critic of the current system, never talk about the root causes of all this or about the core issues, that Alex and others talk about, that might shake the belief one might have in the fundamental way our society works.

I've always been aware of this. That they never touched any important issues concerning the political situation in the West. But thought it could be because of it being an international channel, that didn't have time to ever make a deep cover about any specific country's situation. But, thinking better, that's not true, because they have documentaries and debates that do just that. They just choose not to cover some issues.

How could an absolute monarch (a dictator) of a country that, not only allows the US military to station their CENTCOM headquarters in it's soil[2] and, from there, launch invasions of neighbour countries, but also actively supports them[3], and surely receives money or some sort of compensations in return, ever be some sort of "progressive" Middle Eastern "Kennedy" that, out of an altruistic will, decided to embark on the noble and philanthropic project of funding a truly "independent" news channel?

Every person, with a minimum knowledge of politics, knows that the media is considered to be a form of power. Because of the enormous capability it has to influence people. (Like a radio station around here admits: "What you think, starts with what you listen to.") That's why every political organization has its own media. To emit its propaganda. Wouldn't then that be the obvious reason why this Middle Eastern "Emir" would create is own?

It was immensely naive of me to think that a Middle Eastern dictator would not want to use such a form of power, to expand the one he already has, and that he would give away huge sums of money (a big part, surely, originating from the US military) to an institution he would have no control over and that could possibly use such a power against his own interests. How could he be so stupid? The fact that he remains as dictator of, and doesn't even allow demonstrations in, his country prove that he's not any sort of "progressive" leader. He has created a parliament and given women the right to vote, yes. But so has the Saudi royal family (that is part of the NWO conspiracy) considered creating a parliament. That, in the words of one of it's members, would serve to create the illusion of participation, and freedom of choice, therefore containing and controlling people's aversion against the government.

I could go on about this, but the main point that I want to make, and the reason why I'm writing this, is just to correct what I've said in the past about this recently created news channel.

Don't trust Al Jazeera.

They're funded by a US military ally, or puppet, who's on the payroll of the NWO.

Those deliveries of bin Laden tapes to this station's Arab channel, while it continuously showed revolting images of the Iraq invasion (possibly to "stimulate reactions", as intended in P2OG operations[4]), the attention given to it by the Western media and politicians, the bombing of it's Baghdad bureau, the imprisonment of one of it's cameraman in Guantanamo Bay, were most probably cynical media stunts to call the attention for this network and present it as a voice of the people opposing US expansionism in the Middle East.

This TV network is just another propaganda arm of the NWO.

People say that the first Iraq war was what put CNN on the map. Well, the second one was what introduced us to Al Jazeera. A disguised-as-progressive, in it's English version, "left-wing" alternative, with alternative controlled-left guests, alternative tendentious debates, and alternative omission of, distortion of, and lies about, important facts.

Those of you who have access to it, judge it for yourselves, if you want to. And if you decide on continuing watching it, I recommend that you choose very carefully what you watch, from now on. And I warn you not to expect for it to be completely reliable.



As always... when it comes to understanding how whole networks operate, and the true purpose of some entities, we just have to "follow the money":

Al Jazeera <----- Emir of Qatar <----- US Military (NWO)



---
1. http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=60189
2. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3272101.stm
3. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/camp-as-sayliyah.htm
4. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9447

I'm not defending (as in "supporting", "apologizing for" or "in favor of") the PCP. I think they're one of the worst things there are. I'm an anarchist. Not a left-wing fascist. And I know all about the PCP in the 70's.

I think I have made clear the difference between what I call "true communists" and communist parties as a NWO creation intended to work merely as a pressure group. You might want to read what I wrote again.

I know how crazy this all sounds. I see that you're a newbie here. Continue to listen to Alex Jones, start reading similar authors, read what other people in here have to say about it and you'll see that I'm right.

Well, I don't believe he is a true communist. If he knows it's a hoax he surely knows why. And if he knows why, he also surely knows that the people behind it will never build any kind of Stalinist Utopia.

True communists, like the Portuguese Communist Party, that is of Stalinist tradition, are discretely exposing this hoax, 9/11, etc.

The thing is that communist parties in the West were never intended to fully implement the reforms they claim they want. The true communists you have nowadays are people who were effectively brainwashed by, and truly believe in, Marxist propaganda and that, like Stalin himself, have got out of control of the NWO.

Communism, according to Marx, is a NWO creation. And the communist parties in the West have been created just to shift things into a more "leftist" position. That's why the "Communist Manifesto" was written by a banker, why the Communist Party of the U.S. has been founded by a capitalist, and probably why you have this Monbiot character going along with this capitalist scheme.

The fact that this Monbiot carbon-tax advocate has been involved in left-wing coalitions, if they are comprised of true communists, is probably just to try to lead them back into a more pseudo-communist, NWO-oriented, leftist position.


(This is probably the wrong thread to be talking about it... If you want to understand better what I'm saying, start reading about the NWO origins of Communism. My "Bilderberg-Illuminati" thread, I think, is a good place to start.)

This message has been posted, with full transcript included, in the blog of one of the main scientists here in Portugal that has been exposing the global warming fraud:

http://mitos-climaticos.blogspot.com/2009/12/mensagem-ao-movimento-ambientalista.html


I'm surprised with how informed the scientist in question is and how the word is getting out.

It's not that. This Monbiot character can only be consciously lying. He can't be that stupid as to not be able to understand the evidences that have been laid down in front of him.

This high-profile "left-wing" media characters and writers are also part of the game.

They exist to create acceptance, among the public, to allow the political system to evolve into a more "leftist" position and, at the same time, to make people agree with more police state reforms.


http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=107184
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=43336

Aha!

XviD is just what I wanted.

Thank you very much Scootle and Time2WakeUpSlaves.

It's fantastic.

I'm still seeding the official mininova torrent and I have literally people from *all over the world* downloading it from me.

I have to go check some of the flags that I don't even recognize.

That's just it. This things are intended to be somewhat pleasant in various degrees. A lot of people also like The Rolling Stones, MTV, etc... It's good stuff mixed with bad stuff.

The good stuff being what is definitely pleasant, or positive, and the bad stuff the percentage of whatever harmful substance they decide to add to it.


The best way to poison people is not to serve them glasses full of raw poison. No one will drink raw poison. It tastes bad.

But if you mix it, in small percentages, with sweet drinks, a lot of them won't notice it, and will not only like it, but will probably come back for more.

The torrent in question is incomplete.

The video ends at 40 minutes into the show.


(Not worth downloading in my opinion...)

There's an interesting thread in another sub-forum in here, concerning the same subject of "conditioning people for things to come", started by member "TelepesT":

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=79424

Oh, yes, I even forgot about the fact of the story being based on a very probable false flag operation.

I called the attention for it in another post here in the "false flags" sub-forum:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=80890


Thanks for the playlist, EvadingGrid. I'm going to watch the lecture.


And still about the movie, that ending with a song by the (NWO-created) Rolling Stones glorifying acts of street violence, is just the cherry on top of the cake, and, to me, what makes it obvious that it is definitely a NWO piece of propaganda.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=97552

*present-day political system (I meant.)

(Sorry. I was quite sleepy when I wrote that.)

"Hegelian Propaganda".

Designed to make people, who are against the present-day political institutions, commit acts of violence and destruction, and forget about creating and maintaining functional organizational structures as an alternative to it.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=79600

Oh, no, I hadn't. Thanks for pointing that out.

Another disgusting whitewash.

Aha! At last.

Much more convenient.

Thanks for the tip Scootle.


If someone could encode it in DivX/XviD it would be even better.

(For people to be able to watch it on a DVD player.)

 

Thanks for that clip, Stan. It's great.

It's even better than АЛЕКС's appearances on Russia Today.

Sure, I use my BitTorrent client quite a lot.

I know that many things aired on TV end up being shared online. But, because I suppose this particular show it's for a minority group, I'm not so sure about this one.

I hope it is shared so that I can watch it.

Thanks for the tips, maelstrom.

I can confirm the good quality of some sources that I already knew.

And speaking of torrents and P2P, I've also found some good stuff (Quigley and other authors) in the well-known eD2k+Kad network and in another less known one called "Soulseek".

Will the show be available online in the channel's site or another one for people to watch it?

If not, is someone here (who has the means to) planning on ripping it and sharing it on the web?

Great analogy, by the way, Jackson Holly.

I'm having quite some fun reading about all of this also.

ehehe 

This leak comes in perfect timing.

Right before the media propaganda blitz that will happen because of the Copenhagen summit.

My eternal thanks to the hackers also.



"Obviously this is scientific fraud. They've already been proven that their data was wrong. Now we know it was on purpose."

--- Alex Jones, 23/11/2009

Obvious disinformation to make it appear as if LBJ was not involved and that it is paranoia to believe there was a conspiracy behind the assassination.

If you want to know the truth about it, read Dr. Coleman's monograph on the subject: http://www.coleman300.com/WhitePaper/


Rest In Peace, John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

Try creating a new (mail) account in Google.

You are now forced to give a cell phone number.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G1fNjK9SXg

Speaking of Google and privacy...

Try creating a new (mail) account.

You are now forced to give a cell phone number.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G1fNjK9SXg

You're welcome!

THANKS again, Darth Chaos.

I have checked the old.getdeb site and through it I have now the most recent versions of the P2P programs I wanted.
Not only do they have a Deluge 1.1.9 package for 8.04, but I've discovered in the same site a tool called "Ubuntu Tweak" that, among other things, goes get the recently built packages for 8.04 (in this case) for you, from the PPAs, with the most recent versions of the software it has on the list. And with this tool, I was able to get the most recent version of aMule with the serious bugs fixed.
I had add PPAs in the past to my sources.list for software that was not yet present in Ubuntu's repositories, but I was not aware that some programs sites' PPAs build packages with the most recent software for older versions of some distros.

And I had recently tried to upgrade only some programs with packages of more recent versions of Ubuntu only to screw up my computer, I guess with the resulting mixture because of dependencies.

Now I know a way to safely do it thanks to you.

No "downsides" anymore. Now I have my Ubuntu running just like I wanted to.

Thank you very much once again.

If you don't want to increase the costs with the Internet traffic of the Alex Jones podcast, prefer this commercial free version, and want to bookmark this page so that it goes straight to the most recent posts, bookmark it as such:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=38235.new#new

Once again, UKStewart82, thank you very much for your work.

Thank you very much for your tips, Darth Chaos.

Concerning Transmission, I can say from experience that Deluge is much faster and has much more features than the default BitTorrent client chosen by the Ubuntu team.

And concerning your netbook, as I said above, the distribution I recommend for this type of computers is the one called "easy peasy" (former "Ubuntu Eee"), that is based on Ubuntu. Either the first one (http://www.mininova.org/tor/1790364) - again, based on Ubuntu 8.04 - or the most recent (http://www.geteasypeasy.com/). The first one comes with some problems, but they are easily fixed.

I can confirm that.

I ended installing that one instead of the new one.
Having tried some alternatives to the new buggy Ubuntu 9.10, I ended up installing Ubuntu 8.04 LTS instead.

The tutorial about how to install NVIDIA drivers in the Debian testing version I tried (upgraded from stable, since the weekly built CD images don't seem to work) was a bit above my level of knowledge and patience... (so I still don't recommend Debian to the average GNU/Linux user.)
Still looking for a Debian-family distro and not liking KDE, I tried Mint but, because it's just a polished version of Ubuntu, it still had the same bugs as the Ubuntu version that is based on.

Then, because I remembered that my serious bugs started with 9.04, I looked for previous versions of Ubuntu, and only 8.04 is still available for download in the mirror I use.
I tried this one and every (major) problem I had is gone.
I can now play PyChess, listen to music in Amarok, use Audacious Audio Player as an alarm clock, etc.
The only downside is that some programs' versions are older, but hey, they work(!), and I managed to live with them in the past.

I guess Ubuntu is still a recommendable OS. You just have to be careful with the version you use and not be in a hurry to have the latest, I guess.



You're right.
I've done that in the past (of being one or two versions behind the most recent one) because of lack of support for my ATI graphic card. And have also observed that the versions of Ubuntu, as they are originally launched, are often full of bugs that are solved shortly or sometime after, so I have also, in the past, not been in a hurry to upgrade...

OK. Got it.
So it's the decision itself to give a version LTS that make it a good version.
Thank you very much for your explanation.

Yes, the variety of GNU/Linux flavors make it very adaptable to the diversified needs and tastes of every demanding computer user. And if you still are not satisfied with any given distro, you can always (unlike in Windows) modify one to your needs.
That's one of the reasons I like Free Software so much also.